I’ve written some stories this election cycle about one group or another allegedly trying to confuse voters when it comes to taxes. There are a couple of different tax issues here in Sanford/Lee County that have met with opposition from certain quarters, so I understand that there’s some passionate argument about these things and a perception that the other side isn’t playing fair.
Everyone, of course, denies that they’re trying to confuse people, but I saw something today that tells me otherwise. The “Repeal Business Tax Now” signs that refer to the city of Sanford business privilege license tax were absolutely littered about every single polling place I visited or passed by today.
The business privilege license tax, if you’ll recall, was voted into effect last year by the Sanford City Council and, after a contentious 2007 municipal election in which it figured prominently, came before the council again last month during a failed repeal effort.
It was during this repeal effort that Jon Owens and I co-wrote a story about these “Repeal Business Tax Now” signs and the possibility of them confusing voters about the local option sales tax increase that’s on today’s ballot. The signs, like the anti-business tax campaign itself, are the work of Americans for Prosperity, a national anti-tax group with a Lee County chapter. The focus of the story Jon and I wrote was trying to figure out why AFP would use candidate-style yard signs to talk about the business tax, as it wasn’t on any ballot and can only be repealed by a majority vote of the Sanford City Council.
Of course, AFP representatives said the yard signs were a way of mobilizing the business community’s opposition to the business tax, and that’s a valid argument. The AFP folks also said that they thought voters wouldn’t be confused by the signs.
Fast forward a couple of weeks, after the defeat of the business tax repeal, and you’ve got AFP running a campaign in opposition to the sales tax increase. Which is their prerogative. There are “vote no to a sales tax increase” signs everywhere you look, and I honestly feel like I have to commend their ability to put together a political campaign of that magnitude in just a couple of weeks.
But if AFP really didn’t mean to confuse voters about the two taxes, there wouldn’t have been 10 “Repeal Business Tax Now” signs at Southern Lee when I rode by today. There wouldn’t have been the same number at the American Legion. There wouldn’t be any of them anywhere, because the fate of the business tax (for now, anyway) has been decided. And it’s not on any of the ballots Lee County voters will be filling out today.
The fact is, people don’t like to pay taxes. I believe that AFP hauled their anti-business tax signs out for Election Day because, like it or not, there are always a significant number of voters who don’t do the research, and, honestly, their campaign against the sales tax increase has picked up a lot less traction than their campaign against the business tax did (I covered events for both campaigns).
A criticism of the effort to pass the sales tax increase is that it wasn’t put together early enough. I’d say the same of the AFP campaign to defeat it. If AFP wanted to make a case against the sales tax increase, they should have started earlier and not relied on a shell game of revolving taxes to get people to vote their way.
While I love politics, I’ll be glad when election season calms down for a few weeks after today. It’s all enough to make you get just a little cynical.